Kyrgyzstan: REPORT UNDER UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW

This report is jointly developed by Osh Affiliate of International Centre Interbilim Public Organization and Our Right Public Foundation to be submitted for consideration in the Universal Periodic Review process of the UN Human Rights Council aimed at assessing the progress made by the Kyrgyz Republic in implementing human rights-related recommendations.

Osh Affiliate of International Centre Interbilim Public Organization is independent non-governmental organization established in 2010 in Osh. It is an affiliate of International Centre Interbilim (Bishkek, 1993). The mission of the organization is to ensure development of civil society actors, lobbying citizens’ interests in the government institutions on social and economic rights.

335-11 Lenin Street, Osh, Kyrgyz Republic, 723500
Tel. +996 555077764

www.interbilimosh.kg, e-mail: interbilim.osh@gmail.com
Contact person: Ms. Gulgaky Mamasalieva, Manager, Osh Affiliate of International Centre Interbilim, e-mail: gulgaky777@gmail.com

Our Right Public Foundation is an independent non-governmental organization established in 2008. The mission of the organization is to assist in ensuring openness and accountability of local self-government; provide assistance in the field of protection of the right to adequate housing.

199 Jumabek Street, Bishkek

Contact person:          Ms. Kalicha Umuralieva, legal expert Our Right Public Foundation

Telephone:                  (+996) 0-707-7777-49

Email:                         kalicha56@gmail.com

Summary

This report is provided in accordance with the procedures for document inclusion in the 3rd Universal Periodic Review of Kyrgyzstan. The document reflects challenges and problems regarding the right to adequate housing stipulated by the UN Charter and Treaty Bodies (UPR, ICESCR, CERD), as well as the status of implementation of the right to adequate housing by the State (UN recommendations implementation by the Kyrgyz Government, national housing programmes). Each section of the report analyses the current situation and recommendations (July, 2019).

The sections of the Report are titled as follows:

  1. The housing policy development in Kyrgyzstan.
  2. Housing eviction for State or community needs.

III. Realization of disadvantaged citizens’ rights to housing.

***The 2010 Constitution of the Kyrgyz Republic enshrines fundamental rights and freedoms to housing. Thus, Article 12 of the Constitution of the Kyrgyz Republic states that “property is inviolable. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of their property.”  The Constitution recognizes and protects the right to housing. The Constitution imposes obligations on public authorities – both at the central and local levels – to create the conditions for the realization of the right to housing, including provision of housing free of charge or at an affordable cost to economically disadvantaged people and other persons in need. The Constitution also recognizes the right to inviolability of the home and provides that the search, seizure, inspection or other action, or entry of agents of the public authorities into a home or other buildings owned or otherwise possessed is allowed only on the basis of a judicial instrument.

However, the legislation of the Kyrgyz Republic does not guarantee full protection of citizens’ rights and freedoms in the sphere of adequate housing; the lack of relevant mechanisms for implementation of this right creates settings for violation of the citizens’ right to housing by the authorities.

In some cases, it is possible to say that the authorities ignore international and national norms in the field of citizens’ right to adequate housing.

The UN human rights mechanisms issued six recommendations regarding the right to adequate housing aiming at improving Kyrgyzstan’s compliance with international human rights standards.[1]  However, not all of them have been implemented by the Kyrgyz Republic.

  1. The housing policy development in Kyrgyzstan.

 A recommendation of the second Universal Periodic Review for Kyrgyzstan (Chile, UPS 2015), p. 5, par. 5.124, is to the effect that the state has “to take measures to draft a national strategy to ensure the full realization of the right to adequate housing.” In 2015, the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights review the Combined Second and Third Periodic Reviews of Kyrgyzstan on the implementation of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and passed Concluding Observations on the Combined Second and Third Periodic Reviews of Kyrgyzstan[2], and pursuant to par. 19 “Homelessness and right to adequate housing” of this document, the Committee further recommended that Kyrgyzstan ensure the implementation of a national strategy to reduce the number of homeless persons and indicate measurable goals and timeframes. However, unfortunately, we have to state that the government failed to implement this recommendation. To this day, the country lacks a housing strategy based on UN International Guidelines[3] that would include social housing and homesslessness reduction.

In 2000, the housing policy was approved by the Decree of the President of the Kyrgyz Republic No. 76 dated April 6, 2000 on the Concept for Housing Construction Development until 2010. In 2007, the Government Decree No. 562 of 26 November 2007 approved the National Housing Construction Programme for 2008-2010. However, not a single point of this policy was implemented.

[1] Annex to this report on the status of the UN recommendations implementation

[2]  Approved by the Committee at its 55th session (June 1−19, 2015).

[3] Report of the Special Rapporteur on adequate housing as a component of the right to an adequate standard of living, and on the right to non-discrimination in this context: https://www.undocs.org/en/A/HRC/37/53

In 2015, the Affordable Housing Program of the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic for 2015-2020 was adopted and approved by the Kyrgyz Government Resolution No. 560 dated August 5, 2015. However, the Special Report of the Ombudsman regarding implementation of Bishkek citizens’ right to adequate housing states that “…the current 2015-2020 Affordable Housing programme  does not meet the needs of the most vulnerable groups of the population, who due to low income, employment in informal sector, lack of documents, homelessness are not able to benefit from this program. The program does not provide for the development of housing that is not meant for home ownership; however, some forms of housing such as long-term rental, paid dormitories based on various forms of ownership can be considered as an approach to ensure housing for the most vulnerable citizens.[1]

Moreover, the program is focused on mortgage loans, which in the Kyrgyz context resulted in ‘mortgage’ homeless people due to lack of long money and cheap monetary means in banks. In the state’s understanding ‘mortgage lending’ means establishment of the state mortgage company which receives interest-free money from the budget; however, the people get credits at 14% of annual rate. The Law of the Kyrgyz Republic on State Mortgage Lending adopted on May 4, 2017 does not address the problem, but, on the contrary, aggravates the conditions of citizens.

Despite the fact that the Housing Code of the Kyrgyz Republic contains as set of provisions that are based on norms of international law consistent with recommendations of the former UN Special Rapporteur on Right to Adequate Housing Miloon Kothari, a lack of a proper housing strategy consistent with UN international principles results in the following problems and conflicts in the society.

  1. 1.UN Special Rapporteur on Right to Adequate Housing Raquel Rolnik, having studied the issue of the acquisition of housing based on the right of absolute individual right of ownership (termless ownership) in former planned economy countries that “in the 1990’s implemented projects of large-scale privatization of state housing which resulted in radical changes in the structure of legal form of ownership of housing”[2], in her Report at the 22nd Session of Human Rights Council in 2012 suggested to states to focus not on acquisition of housing on the basis of the right of private ownership but on the development of leased/rented housing and various forms of rental relations[3].

1.2. Another type of home ownership is acquisition of housing through equity construction. The lack of proper legal framework regulating this type of commercial housing has also resulted in major conflicts and discontent of the population, as well as created corruption in the field of construction.  The boundless thirst for profit among developers’ companies, overstatement of the housing costs, deprived many shareholders of housing or money. Thus, they joined the category of homeless citizens.

1.3. In Kyrgyzstan, multistory houses account for 30% of the housing stock. Privatization of apartments in such buildings created the problem related to shared property, and the house plots. Despite the proper current legislation, only single owners were able to receive house plots’ documents in compliance with the norms of the Land and Housing Codes. Many house owners have lost their property due to corruption in the construction sector; collusion between officials and construction companies has resulted in illegal seizure of these land plots to be used for construction purposes. These actions violated the right of citizens to shared property and limited their access to the green and children’s play areas. The General Prosecutor of the Kyrgyz Republic, together with Our Right Public Foundation, repeatedly repealed legal acts that restricted this right to shared property. Over the past five years, local NGOs were involved in 120 cases restoring the right to shared ownership, which accounts for 5% of the total housing stock in apartment buildings.

Recommendations:

1.1.Considering the above-mentioned, the State shall develop adequate housing policy in accordance with international standards and the State’s capabilities to ensure the following:

– Regulate rental housing;

– Regulate shared construction;

– Regulate common/shared property in apartment buildings;

– strengthening of various forms of ownership

1.1.1.Rental housing.

А.It is necessary to develop the norms stipulated in the Civil Code of the Kyrgyz Republic and adopt a separate law and by-laws regulating this issue, defining the rights and obligations of tenants and landlords.

B.The state and municipal rental housing shall be built and provided to public and municipal employees, as well as to vulnerable groups of population.

1.1.2.Equity construction.

А.It is necessary to adopt the Law of the KR on Equity Construction, which stipulates the norms for any construction company to have 70% of the construction cost in its account in order to avoid frauds.

B.It is also necessary to develop the initiative proposed by Our Right PF to Bishkek Mayor’s Office regarding the need for approval of detailed design projects in areas of renovation on a quarterly basis. This will allow to stop urban in-fills, and violation of landowners’ rights.

C.Develop a number of regulatory and legal acts regarding renovations.

D.Develop housing construction through housing construction cooperatives (HCCs).

1.2. Shared property in apartment buildings.

1.2.1. General Prosecutor Office of the Kyrgyz Republic to adopt acts for procuratorial actions in case of shared property transfers to owners of residential and non-residential premises in apartment buildings;

1.2.2 The Government of the Kyrgyz Republic and the General Prosecutor Office of the Kyrgyz Republic shall take measures to encourage LSG bodies to implement Resolutions of Jogorku Kenesh of the Kyrgyz Republic and the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic regarding shared property;

1.2.3 LSG bodies shall carry out an inventory of municipal property, and transfer the property that is a shared property by law to owners of residential and non-residential premises in apartment buildings;

1.2.4. Registration bodies together with architecture bodies shall identify disputed shared property.

  1. Housing Eviction for State or Community Needs;

The UN human rights mechanisms have urged Kyrgyzstan to ensure full compliance of the national legislation with international obligations regarding evictions and resettlement only in case when these measures are justified.[4] A similar recommendation was made by the UN Treaty Body, the CERD, in 2018: to take the necessary measures to ensure effective legal safeguards against arbitrary land expropriation and forced evictions, and ensure that the population is aware of and able to benefit from such safeguards; as well as include provisions on compensation and alternative housing in national legislation, and ensure that house demolitions and forced evictions are used only as a last resort;[5]

2.1. Thus, the Kyrgyz State received recommendations on eviction and expropriation of land procedures twice (2015, 2018). Unfortunately, the authorities of the Kyrgyz Republic have not taken any actions yet to improve the norms and practices to realize the right to housing in case of eviction. According to the current Land Code of the Kyrgyz Republic, the development of procedures and mechanisms for housing eviction is delegated to the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic. However, so far, these mechanisms are not included in the legislation. The lack of special norms allows the executive authorities to implement procedures for land eviction in different cases at their own discretion, without taking into account the interests of the disabled persons, single mothers and children.

In 2015, the Ministry of Justice of the Kyrgyz Republic made an effort to draft the Government Regulation on Land Revocation Procedures for State Needs. Since this draft did not comply with the provisions of the Constitution of the Kyrgyz Republic and international standards, and did not guarantee freedom and the right to housing, the draft was withdrawn by the civil society. According to Article 20 of the Constitution of the Kyrgyz Republic it is prohibited to adopt bylaws restricting human and civil rights and freedoms. The need to develop a special law may also be justified through Part 6, Article 12 of the Constitution of the Kyrgyz Republic, which provides that procedures for the owners to exercise their rights, and safeguards for their protection are determined by the law. Therefore, it is recommended that revocation issues shall be regulated by a higher-level normative legal act – the law, rather than by the Government Regulation.

In December 2018, representatives of civil society submitted the norms regulating housing eviction to the Ministry of Justice, and requested to integrate them into the draft Land Code, that was placed on the website of the Ministry of Justice for public discussion. Unfortunately, not a single proposal from the civil society regarding regulation of house demolition and eviction for state and community needs was included in the new draft Land Code of the Kyrgyz Republic. The new draft Land Code proposes to make evictions as a last resort through the court, when the court can issue decisions in terms of reasonableness and legality of eviction justification. In practice, in case of forced evictions, disputes often arise due to unfair compensations and resettlement in disadvantaged locations.

2.2 Compensations. Since 2010, there has been an increase in the number of forced household evictions, especially regarding the property of ethnic minorities. In Osh, Kyrgyzstan, 22 households of ethnic minorities were demolished and evicted (repurchase) by local authorities in 2012-13, and 28 households were evicted by Jalal-Abad municipality in 2014. In 2017, 34 ethnic minorities’ households were evicted in the Kyrgyz – Uzbek border area. In all cases, the rights of citizens to property were violated. Forced evictions affected around 450 ethnic minorities’ representatives. Through intervention of Interbilim, only 34 out of 82 households received proportional compensations. However, there are no mechanisms for fair calculation of compensations in case of housing evictions established by the State. The Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination made the following recommendations in 2018: to include a provision on compensation and alternative housing in the national legislation (24.d).[6] Unfortunately, the State has not yet taken any steps to incorporate these recommendations into its land and housing legislation. Moreover, the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic made a commitment to implement paragraph 24 within its interagency plans (2019-2020) for implementation of the CERD recommendations; however, the action plans do not propose any specific activities, but rather describe it in general terms – ‘to take measures to address disparities among ethnic minorities in their enjoyment of economic and social rights.’

In doing so, the State escapes from its obligation to enhance the Kyrgyz legislation in terms of improving voluntary eviction mechanisms and proportionate compensations.

The existing eviction norm in the legislation of the Kyrgyz Republic does not fully implement the Constitutional provision on prerequisite for exercise of the right. Meanwhile, the importance of interim compensation or provision of equivalent housing shall be considered through the prism that, in addition to the risk of homelessness, persons who are deprived of their property may be completely deprived of their means of subsistence and income, and they will have to adapt to a new place of residence and new circumstances, and their standard of living may decrease. It may also affect children’s access to education, loss of social relations, breakup of kinship ties, etc.

On the other hand, there is a risk that the country will not achieve SDG targets, and this will generate poverty, and cause a five-year setback in human development. Within 2 to 3 years after eviction, residents whose households were demolished or evicted have to live on less than USD$1.25 per day.

2.3 Guarantees for the protection of the rights. There are no conditions to challenge unfair compensations in courts, no conditions for alternative assessment and comparison of prices, no conditions for free choice of instruments for property valuation. Citizens have limited access to information on city planning documents, which are often the reason for housing eviction.

The practice of eviction for State needs demonstrates that all demolition and eviction notifications are delivered in a short notice. Moreover, ethnic minorities have limited access to information related to the grounds for eviction, procedures for demolished property assessment and terms of contracts’ discussions. They have also limited opportunities to get information in their native language.

In 2015, CESCR recommended to duly justify any evictions or resettlements. As of today, the country did not establish or enshrine in its legislation any mechanisms related to the provision of information to citizens regarding any housing eviction cases.

Currently, the citizens are deprived of the following rights in case of eviction:

  • Access to meaningful consultations;
  • Proper and early notification;
  • Information on planned resettlements/eviction within a reasonable time frame;
  • Prohibition of evictions in bad weather or at night; provision of legal remedies;
  • Provision of legal aid to persons who need it, for them to seek redress through the courts.

Residnts often apply to non-governmental organizations in Kyrgyzstan in case of housing demolition or eviction. Local NGOs that protect citizens’ rights to adequate housing are often harassed and abused by the authorities. It particularly refers to cases when they protect the interests of ethnic minorities. Thus, the leader of the Osh Interbilim affiliate was humiliated and abused by the Mayor of Jalal-Abad in 2017. In 2019, the head of Interbilim-Osh received insulting and humiliating words from Osh Mayor’s Office while protecting the rights of citizens. Currently, the NGO leader has initiated a lawsuit against Osh Mayor’s office employee to protect her honor, dignity and business reputation. It should be noted that an affront and insult towards local NGOs discourages victims to apply and seek consultations in civil society institutions.

Recommendations:

  • Hold public hearings to discuss the draft Land Code of the Kyrgyz Republic, in particular involving vulnerable groups and ethnic minorities, whose houses are subject to demolition or eviction for state and community needs according to Master Plans for cities, villages and settlements.

2.2 Provide for special measures in the draft Land Code to ensure that evictions are carried out in strict compliance with the provisions of international human rights law in accordance with the guidelines of the UN, including a separate instruction on how to calculate losses in case of property demolition. Include proposals of the civil society regarding implementation of the right to housing in case of eviction in the draft Land Code.

2.3. Include activities to improve national legislation related to fair compensations, and alternative housing provision in case of evictions in the Government inter-ministerial plan for the CERD recommendations implementation.

III. Realization of disadvantaged citizens’ rights to housing.

3.1. Introduction of private ownership for land, and privatization of agricultural lands resulted in creating another corrupt practice. Local government officials in collusion with the registration services carried out unlimited transfer of agricultural irrigated lands, which at the time of accession to independence amounted at only 7%, for housing construction. As a result, the country has lost 1,000 hectares of fertile irrigated lands, which may have a negative effect on food security and provision. In order to attract these people to their electorate, politicians repeatedly proposed to legalize these illegally seized lands. However, the state did not benefit from land seizure and the loss of agricultural land, but rather acquired a major problem – the so-called new settlements. To date, over 5,000 households in Bishkek and Osh suburbs have no property titles with a limited access to other services, health care services and education. The residents in these settlements are mostly poor people with internal migrant status.

3.2. One of the Committee’s recommendations under paragraph 26 (c) Pollution and Ground Contamination in the Concluding Observations is to ensure that residential areas are not located on or close to contaminated ground. In this regard, new buildings near landfills and animal burial sites are of particular concern.[7] Despite the fact that the Housing Code of the Kyrgyz Republic prohibits construction of housing near these burial sites, people seize these lands and build housing there. The authorities do not take any measures to liquidate new settlements, thus posing a risk to epidemiological safety. This is noted in paragraph 2.3.2 of the Report of the Ombudsman of the Kyrgyz Republic on human and civil rights and freedoms observance in the Kyrgyz Republic in 2014.[8]

3.3. Signing of the Convention on Persons with Disabilities by the State requires the policy development related to persons with disabilities. Its lack has led to corruption in practice. For example, the State has allocated large sums of money to build houses for the blind and deaf community throughout the country. This led to corruption in non-commercial organization when their leadership allocated more than 50 per cent of the housing meant for the blind and deaf community to their close relatives and friends for monetary rewards. Criminal proceedings were initiated, and the judgment to punish the leader was issued. These actions of the blind and deaf leadership caused an outrage, including rallies, among members of the community. Judicial proceedings are currently under way, investigation to return this property, which was built through budget money, to the government ownership is initiated, followed by reallocation of housing through authorized social protection bodies. Similar violations of the right of people with disabilities to residual housing occurred in Osh in 2018, when apartments planned for 64 persons with disabilities were allocated to different people rather than to families who were on a list for many years or persons with the first degree of disability. Investigations of violations related to apartment allocation procedures are currently underway. Officials who committed acts of corruption shall be prosecuted. However, punishment of officials does not help people with housing needs to restore their right to housing. Decisions are not reviewed, and PWDs are not allowed to participate in the work of the commission allocating housing.

Not all persons could get an access to the housing stock built for the June events victims. Out of 100% of June events victims who were included in the program of socially assisted housing of the State Directorate for Reconstruction and Development (families of the killed and wounded), 20% of injured persons did not get apartments due to corrupt inter-governmental commission in charge of housing allocation.

Recommendations:

3.1. Conduct an inventory of all illegal land seizures and ensure compliance with the law. Take adequate measures to return and restore agricultural lands.

3.2 Conduct an in-depth study of the situation of citizens living in prohibited and contaminated areas. Assess the damage to health, and human development in general. Take specific measures to resettle them in safer locations.

3.3 Accept the UN Committee on Social, Economic and Cultural Affairs (19) recommendations[9] regarding the reduction of the number of homeless people, and allocate relevant financial resources to implement this policy. Establish practices for public housing construction and its allocation through social protection system on a rental terms, develop clear criteria to identify persons and conditions for this type of housing provision. Address social housing issues, including housing planned for people with disabilities.

[1] http://www.ombudsman.kg/files/docs/reports/2016/new-buildings.pdf.

[2]33. As a result, the financial sector and the private housing market, coupled with support for households to take on credit debt, became primary mechanisms for allocating housing solutions. Foreign assistance from international organizations greatly influenced the development of market-based housing finance and boosted housing market activity in developing countries. Report of the Special Rapporteur on adequate housing as a component of the right to an adequate standard of living, and on the right to non-discrimination in this context, Raquel Rolnik, https://undocs.org/A/HRC/22/46

[3] 26. «.. registered leasehold (ownership for a specified period, from a few months to 999 years); public rental (rental occupation of publicly owned land or housing); private rental (rental of privately owned property); collective or communal ownership, including cooperative (ownership is vested in the cooperative or group of which residents are co-owners); community land trust (a non-profit organization develops and stewards affordable housing on behalf of a community); and customary ownership or use. Report of the Special Rapporteur on adequate housing as a component of the right to an adequate standard of living, and on the right to non-discrimination in this context, Raquel Rolnik. https://undocs.org/A/HRC/22/46

[4] ICESCR 19 (a).

[5] CERD, 26d

[6] CERD, 24.d

[7] According to Nurlan Kerimkulov, head of Bishkek Sanitary and Environmental Service, about 20,000 people live near Bishkek landfill, and in the neighbourhood of cattle burial site and a cemetery; in 2006, they illegally seized these lands. Many of them are waste diggers. There is a risk of infectious diseases outbreak. 1,000 people live in the village near Osh landfill.

[8] https://ombudsman.kg/images/files/reports/2014.pdf

[9] See Attachment to this report. Information on implementation of the UN Committee recommendation by the Kyrgyz Republic under the third Universal Periodic Review

 

«ЛАЙФХАК»: ПОРЯДОК СНОСА И ОЦЕНКА КОМПЕНСАЦИЙ (ЧАСТЬ-1)

Как компенсируется перевозка «домвещей» и съем временного жилья?

После публикации разъяснений юристов относительно оценки и компенсации при сносе жилых домов и принудительном выселении в наш адрес поступило множество вопросов относительно получения других различных видов компенсаций при сносе многоквартирных домов и некоторых особенностей порядка сноса жилых домов.

Мы условно разделили поступившие вопросы на две части «порядок сноса» и «оценка компенсаций».

Для начала юристы ОО «Независимый центр по защите прав человека» прокомментируют вопросы относительно различных видов компенсаций при сносе жилья и принудительном выселении.

Итак, «оценка компенсаций». Мы выбрали пять самых часто задаваемых вопросов…

http://constuction.tilda.ws/10lifehacksdemolitionampcompensation_part1

СЕТЬ ЦА: ЭДВОКАСИ МЕРОПРИЯТИЯ ПО ОТСТАИВАНИЮ ЖИЛИЩНЫХ ИНТЕРЕСОВ ГРАЖДАН

В 2019 году членами Центрально-Азиатской сети по праву на достаточное жилище в рамках принятых планов реализовано шесть  совместных эдвокаси мероприятий на региональном уровне и девятнадцать на уровне стран-членов Сети Центральной Азии по праву на достаточное жилище, указывают авторы отчета работы Сети за 2019 год.

Одним из компонентов отчета о работе Центрально-Азиатской сети по праву на достаточное жилище за 2019 год является улучшение нормативной среды в странах ЦА по праву на достаточное жилище, лоббирование интересов граждан на национальном и международном уровнях.

Эдвокаси прогрессивной поддержки

Авторы отчета по этому компоненту приводят, что члены региональной сети на региональном уровне провели ряд эдвокаси мероприятий.

Так, члены Сети 23 ноября 2018 года обратились к госсекретарю и генпрокурору Казахстана по факту избиения в столице Казахстана правозащитницы Ляззат Камзе. Авторы заявления расценивают произошедшее как нарушение конституционных прав граждан на достаточное жилище, а также на защиту от принудительного выселения, на получение равнозначной компенсации.

Наряду с этим, члены Сети  30 июля 2019 года обратились с открытым письмом к Президенту Узбекистана Шавкату Мирзиёеву  с просьбой принять надлежащие меры для обеспечения и осуществления права на достаточное жилище, признавая важное значение в этом отношении международного сотрудничества, основанного на свободном согласии, а также обеспечить верховенство закона, укрепить законность и порядок в целях защиты социальных, экономических, политических и других прав и свобод человека и гражданина, поддержать соблюдение прав и свобод человека, признанных высшей ценностью всеми структурами и должностными лицами.

Авторы отчета указывают, что по случаю ежегодного празднования Международного дня жилища (HABITAT), в октябре 2019 года, Сеть выступила с обращением и призвала власти четырех стран Центральной Азии предотвратить нарушение прав человека на достаточное жилище и предоставить соразмерную компенсацию в связи со сносом и изъятием жилья.

В отчете приводится, что координатор региональной сети Шоира Давлатова выступила с докладом на заседании БДИЧП ОБСЕ (Варшава) по ситуации в четырех странах ЦА в части принудительного выселения на основе результатов страновых исследований.

Также в качестве международной адвокации нарушений прав граждан при изъятии жилья членами сети ЦА были подготовлены и направлены в Комитет ООН альтернативные доклады по Казахстану и Кыргызстану. Наряду с этим, 2-4 октября 2019 года эксперты-члены сети от Кыргызстана на 80-й сессии Комитета ООН по жилищным и земельным вопросам в Женеве озвучили факты нарушения прав граждан на достаточное жилище.

Акции прямого действия

В отчете также отмечается проведение мероприятий на страновом уровне.

Так, например, в Казахстане в 2019 году была создана Общественная сеть  организаций Казахстана по социальным, экономическим и культурным правам для содействия решению проблем по изъятию жилья. Восемь общественных организаций из разных регионов Казахстана объединили усилия по предупреждению незаконных сносов жилья.

Члены Сети в Казахстане подготовили и направили альтернативный доклад на УПО ООН по правам граждан при изъятии жилья с целью дальнейшего включения в рекомендации по предупреждению принудительных изъятий для Правительства страны. В основу доклада положены результаты исследований по изъятию жилья.

Институт Омбудсмена Кыргызстана провел экспертные консультации в стране с целью обсуждения результатов исследования по изъятию жилья, проведенного членами Сети. По итогам экспертами от власти и ОО приняты восемь рекомендаций для предупреждения принудительного изъятия жилья. Одна из рекомендаций касается разработки проекта Положения Правительства КР «О порядке изъятия жилья для общественных нужд». Отчет по исследованию включен в ежегодный отчет Омбудсмена КР для озвучивания на заседании Парламента КР.

В Таджикистане при Исполнительном аппарате Президента Таджикистана создана рабочая группа по разработке проекта Жилищного кодекса. Член Сети по ПДЖ, Общественная организация «Независимый центр по защите прав человека», принимает участие в разработке проекта Жилищного кодекса Республики Таджикистан. Членами сети ЦА пролоббирована в Жилищный кодекс глава по вопросам изъятия жилья.

Представителями местного сообщества составлена и подана частная жалоба спецдокладчику по праву на достаточное жилище и спецдокладчику по сохранению культурного наследия о грубых нарушениях прав населения со стороны власти при изъятии жилья, а также о нанесенном ущербе памятникам культуры при реконструкции городов Хива, Самарканд и Бухара.

Наряду с этим в каждой из четырех стран проводились круглые столы, информационные кампании по популяризации индикаторов ЦУР, касающихся права на достаточное жилище.

Вместе с тем, каждая из организаций-членов Сети активизировала работу в социальных сетях. Например, истории о нарушении прав граждан периодически освещаются на сайте ОО «Независимый центр по защите прав человека», а также на страничке в Фейсбуке. Или, в Узбекистане периодически освещаются случаи нарушений прав и интересов граждан в группе «Ташкент-Cнос» в соцсети Фейсбук и доносят голос граждан до Президента и Правительства Узбекистана.

ЦЕНТРАЛЬНОАЗИАТСКИЕ АКТИВИСТЫ СОЗДАЛИ СЕТЬ ПО ПРАВУ НА ДОСТАТОЧНОЕ ЖИЛИЩЕ

Правозащитные организации Казахстан, Кыргызстан, Узбекистан и Таджикистан объединились в сеть для реализации прав на достаточное жилище

Создание и расширение правозащитных организаций в Центральной Азии.

На встрече принимали участие представители общественных объединений Казахстана, Кыргызстана, Узбекистана и Таджикистана.

Поделились опытом.

Шухрат Ганиев, директор ОО «Гуманитарный правовой центр» (Бухара), рассказал о проблемах компенсации собственникам сносимого жилья.

-Проблемы часто бывают вызваны конфликтами и длительными судебными разбирательствами между собственниками жилья, их родственниками и постоянно проживающими в них людьми, а также государственными решениями, принимающими решения об изъятии земельных участков и поселений там, где они находятся, – подчеркнул узбекский правозащитник.

ОО «Независимый центр защиты прав человека» Шоира Давлатова

По словам Шоиры Давлатовой, законодательством Таджикистана не раскрывается понятие выселения граждан «для государственных и общественных нужд». Также, не предусмотрены гарантии защиты прав граждан в случаях выселения по этим основаниям, не разработаны нормы о приоритетности интересов собственников жилья перед другими. На практике это приводит к случаям массовых выселений с нарушениями прав граждан-собственников жилья.

– Законодатель гарантирует предоставление равноценного жилого помещения взамен сносимого. Однако не определены критерии оценки, не принимается во внимание рыночная стоимость жилья. Вместе с тем даже в тех случаях, когда применяются рыночные расценки, существуют просрочки выплаты сумм компенсаций, -говорит Давлатова.

Руководитель фонда развития парламентаризма в Казахстане Зауреш Батталова, говоря о важности создания сети и объединению усилий по защите прав граждан в сфере жилищных вопросов остановилась на формах бездомности.

Зауреш Баталова выделила три формы бездомности.

– «Первичная бездомность» – от нее страдают люди, которые не имеют нормального жилья – т.е. живущие на улицах, спящие в парках, незаконно проживающие в непригодных для жизни строениях, а также те, которые в качестве временного убежища используют автомашины или железнодорожные вагоны. «Вторичная бездомность» – от нее страдают люди, постоянно меняющие одну форму временного убежища на другую, в том числе люди, проживающие в жилище, предоставленном им в экстренных случаях, проживающие временно с другими семьями или проживающие в интернатах и приютах на краткосрочной основе. «Третичная бездомность» – от нее страдают люди, проживающие в приютах и интернатах в течение среднего или длительного периода времени. В таких приютах или интернатах обычно нет отдельных спален и гостиных комнат, кухонь и ванных комнат с туалетами, кроме того, они не гарантируют защиту от выселения, которая обычно обеспечивается арендой, – подчеркнула Баталова.

На этой встрече принимала участие Нино Кашакашвили, руководитель центра обучения и мониторинга прав человека из Грузии.

В своем выступлении она остановилась на основных проблемах государственной политики в отношении бездомности в Грузии.

После выступлений участников, правозащитники решили объединиться в одну сеть.

-Проблемы у каждой страны практически одинаковые, но в каждой стране есть свои отличительные особенности и объединение в одну сеть даст больше возможностей для эффективного взаимодействия в регионе, – говорит руководитель OSI AF Кыргызстан, Тахмина Ашуралиева

Арууке Кадырбердиева, представитель общественного фонда «Наше право» (Кыргызстан) и Гульнара Ахматова представитель Ошского Филиала ОО «МЦ Интербелим», перечисляя перспективы создания сети на уровне региона указала обмен опытом и практикой в сфере права на достаточное жилье

-Повышение сотрудничества правозащитников и представителей института Омбудсмена в сфере правоприменительной практики. Все члены СНГ должны были принять участие в заявках на международные платформы и встречи.

Во время заключительной части встречи участники разработали цели и задачи, правила работы центральноазиатской сети по реализации прав на достаточное жилище.

Так, по результатам душанбинской встречи правозащитников было создано новое неформальное объединение правозащитников региона, был подписан меморандум о взаимодействии и сотрудничестве активистских организаций Казахстана, Кыргызстана, Узбекистана и Таджикистана.